I have found current court case against terrorist Abderrahman Bouanane bewildering: HOW is it possible, that lawyer of the said Bouanane mr Kaarle Gummerus, that his client, a self proclaimed terrorist is not in fact a terrorist. Mr Gummerus arguing comes from strain that two murders cannot terrorize a “country”, and thus Bouanane cannot be a terrorist. as after killing two bystanders Bouanane hoped to get a way, but was shot and arrested by the police at the scene. Also Gummerrus blames error in translating the EU directive materiel into Finnish terrorism law.
So legalese bulshitry and Finnish gymnastics are indeed funny to witness, and I’m sure all participants (defense, prosecution and victims) hope for long and “productive” trials to get maximal revenues from the State. The guy has declared himself an ISIS supporter, has expressed the “hope to die as a martyr” for their cause, has declared that he wanted to kill Finns in order to carry out ISIS war against the west. But Getting to be a terrorist ain’t so easy in Finland.